Monday, April 23, 2007
Topix founder asks: Was mass-media just a passing phenomenon?
Web 2.0 Expo: Media Companies Confront Mortality
Panelists offer troubling news to traditional media companies about the
future of the online landscape.
By Thomas Claburn
April 16, 2007 03:00 PM
Representatives of traditional media companies who came to the Web 2.0
Expo 2007 hoping to hear how their companies fit into the evolving online
landscape learned little that offered comfort at the Media 2.0 conference
session led by Forrester Research analyst Charlene Li.
Apart from the acknowledgment that Google hadn't quite extended its
dominance of search advertising into brand promotion -- though Google's
agreement to acquire DoubleClick will change that -- the message for
old-style media magnates was more or less change or die.
"Maybe mass media was just a temporary phenomenon," mused Rich Skrenta,
co-founder and CEO of news aggregator Topix, noting that mass media arose
as a consequence of controlled distribution and captive consumer
attention. Today, of course, getting one's message out, or film or song,
for that matter, doesn't require approval from distribution channel
gatekeepers. And that's profoundly troubling to those who thrived under
It's not hard to understand why panelists make pronouncements such as,
"The mobile internet is going to put the final nail into print media," as
Ted Shelton, founder and CEO of personal news aggregation site The
Personal Bee, put it.
"Consumers have scarce attention and abundant choices," came a question
and lament from a member of the audience who wanted to know how
advertising would work in the new world order.
The advice offered by panelists was to be early to market and unique as a
startup. And for established companies, the recommended strategy was to
get past anger and denial, embrace slowness as a large company, and become
part of Web 2.0 through acquisitions.
Of course that strategy -- legitimate despite the obvious element of wish
fulfillment coming from a panel full of poorly capitalized Web startups --
brings with it the risk of smothering the acquired company. Shelton
likened the situation to a "3-year-old getting a new hamster and loving it
so much she squeezes it to death."
So what's a multimillion dollar media company to do? Give up on creating
branded content and become a content aggregator, suggested Shelton, who,
like his fellow panelists, represented content aggregation companies.
That didn't sit too well with the media executive whose question had
prompted that response. Rejecting the idea, he countered, "We have a 70%
type-in ratio," a reference to the fact that most visitors to his
company's Web site typed the company's brand name into the browser address
The question is how long major media brands can continue to drive such
behavior in the absence of consumer attention. It's a worry that has
companies like Microsoft looking for solutions, as can be seen from the
company's recent patent application for "network-branded recorded
programs," which describes a way to let consumers search for recorded
video content by brand.
Whether such initiatives will counter the erosion of brand power as
brand-agnostic aggregators capture more and more eyeballs remains to be
seen. The one certainty for media companies at this point is that doing
nothing is not an option.
This article above is copyrighted material, the use of which may not have specifically authorized by the copyright owner. The material is made available in an effort to advance understanding of political, economic, democracy, First Amendment, technology, journalism, community and justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' as provided by Section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Chapter 1, Section 107, the material above is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this blog for purposes beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.